Weblog

Sunday, 24 May 2009

  • Why Adam Lambert was NOT Robbed on American Idol

    I am so annoyed with all of the posts on Xanga, Facebook and Myspace with groups saying Adam Lambert was robbed. There are several arguments as to why Adam did not win. First, The Fox Network. People have been saying that because Fox is the most conservative network on television, it was fixed so that a gay man would not win. SERIOUSLY? The producers would NEVER let that happen. American Idol doesn't want to experience doses of Haterade for the rest of its run because Fox didn't let a gay man win. I think people are just using that excuse to make Adam look like a martyr and they're just looking for someone to blame.

    And did anyone even WATCH the finale??? The producers didn't even think Kris was going to be in the top two. Adam and Danny - not Kris - and the same outline for the finale performance. Adam sang a mini-solo followed by a medley with KISS. Danny sang a mini-solo followed by a medley with Lionel Ritchie. Kris's performance was not unlike the rest of the top 13 on the show. He sang a duet, one song with Keith Urban. The general outline of his performance was just like Allison's with Cyndi Lauper and everyone else who wasn't in the top two. 

    No Boundaries - the song written by Kara and some other people for the top two - just like the finale, was never written with Kris in mind. It was obviously too high for him. Some people are saying "Oh, its a song about the underdog or whatever" but no, its just the same stupid song they write every year about struggling through the competition that is Idol. Being a Kris fan myself, I was kind of bummed because Adam did rock it out and Kris kind of blew on that song - or at least he was struggling a lot to hit those notes so I thought that would affect the vote. That song was written for the likes of Adam, Danny and Allison. But silly me, I forgot that at this point in the competition, people don't care what you sound like.

    I was an Adam fan up until recently. My friend had all of the American Idol songs on her Ipod and we were listening to them in the car and I decided hey - I want them. So I went on ITunes and I was looking through the season and all of the songs they sang. I realized that, despite my love for Adam, I didn't want ANY of his songs on my IPod, but I bought about eight of Kris's and a few of Danny's. To me, that says that Adam was not a sure thing and people weren't voting for him because his choice of music through the weeks doesn't appeal to as many people. And you have to know, his song choices are a precursor to what his album is going to be like.

    I also think, that aside from Adam's music not being appealing to so many people, I think that Adam himself wasn't as relatable as Kris. Teeny-boppers did not find themselves attracted to emo hair and guy-liner wearing tight pleather pants that looked like snake skin. They found themselves attracted to the cutie-pie, boy-next-door with the adorable flannel and the cute hair cut. When so many of these girls voting are developing crushes on their American Idol's (myself included), its easier to 'fall in love' with someone like Kris as opposed to Adam, despite Adam's glowing stage presence. Adam has a cool look and everything and I think he pulls it all off very, very well but it just isn't attractive to most of the teenage girls voting and, lets face it, guys don't really vote.

    So, stepping down off of my Soap Box, that is why I do not think Adam Lambert was robbed. It makes absolute sense that Kris won over Adam and it had nothing to do with bigotry, ignorance, politics or religion.

Wednesday, 22 April 2009

  • Gay Marriage - Church or State?

    I don't know what I am - Liberal or Conservative. I vote Democrat or Republican depending on which views I, not necessarily agree with, but think are best for the country, state, town or whatever. I don't know how I feel about gay marriage, but I think people's views of it are very mislead. When asked about gay marriage sometime during the debates, I believe it was Joe Biden who said marriage is a religious ceremony. But is it really? I mentioned this fact to someone and they explained to me the history - which I actually recalled learning at some point during high school. Holy Matrimony was not an original sacrament. In very early Christianity, marriage was a private matter and somehow has managed to become a public, nation-wide issue. There was a time - and my memory is quite foggy - where the Catholic church in Italy was selling sacraments...I believe as a way to convert people to Christianity. It was then that they decided to make marriage a sacrament and a religious event, so to speak. Before this, it was simply a legal contract, and in early Rome not even that - it was simply a mutual agreement and that was that with no government or religious involvement. Today, there are so many variations on standards and morals, this would never work.

    Some people are against gay marriage because of religion. That's awesome - I respect that. Christianity decided long ago that a man should not lay with another man. But they also decided that marriage was not for love - though that was more of just a general happenstance as opposed to a 'law'. And the ceremony that Biden (or possibly Obama) spoke of began as not a religious ceremony, but more of a cultural ceremony.

    (Please forgive my jumping around...I can't think in a straight line.)

    Our country was founded somewhat on Christianity but also grew from freedom of religion. It grew so much and now, not everyone is a Christian (surprise, surprise). So why is the country still acting as though we are a strictly Christian nation? This mainly comes into affect with controversial issues such as gay marriage and abortion. When people bring forth these issues, its almost as if you're looked at as a non-Christian if you believe one thing, and a Christian if you believe another. The country was founded with straight, Christian white men at the top and every other race, religion, creed, color put below them, along with women.

    If everyone else has come so far, why can't people accept the gay community trying to make the jump into the acceptance pool?

    My biggest problem with people who are anti-gay marriage is that they feel like its their business. If you're a woman and you don't believe in gay marriage - that's cool - you don't have to marry a woman. If you're uncomfortable around gay people, don't hang out with them. I'm sure people with think negative things about you, but they'd think the same thing if you were friends with them and then they found out you severely disprove of their lifestyle.

    I think what California did was a little wrong...sort of. I like that they voted for gay marriage, but the way they went about it was disappointing. First, they legalized gay marriage and THEN they had a vote and it got taken away. States should have a vote first. My opinion is that gay marriage is both a church and state issue. Since it isn't the business of any straight, anti-gay people anyway, it should just be legal nation-wide and then your church can decide that its a sin or anti-Christian or whatever and then your church doesn't have to perform a gay marriage ceremony. That's the beauty of America - we don't have to do anything we don't want to (within reason - we still have to pay taxes :( ). Or if people are so unhappy with the idea of people they don't know who love each other getting married, then a state-by-state vote would probably work out best. And then, no one could ever take it away, unless the Federal Government just felt like fighting about it forever.

    I'm sure this whole thing just seems like an endless rant, but I hope I made some clear points. Here comes the question you're never supposed to ask anyone:

    What does your religion tell you about gay marriage? How do you think it should be handled in the government?

Sunday, 01 February 2009

  • My President is Black

    How can black people consider this song to be okay? The word 'nigger' is in there at least twelve times, right next to Obama, Martin Luther King, Jr., Booker T Washington, Jackie Robinson and Sidney Poitier. Not to mention the fact that Young Jeezy claims no president ever did shit for him. In my eyes, the entire song is completely ignorant. You're so proud to be black, proud to have a black president and feel you should be held in higher regard because America is now a little more equal, now that we finally have our first half-black president. But when you have a song about black pride and your black president, the legitimacy of the entire thing is completely lost when you throw around 'nigger' twelve times. I can't imagine any of those men mentioned in the song would be thrilled about it. Its a nice idea to have a song about our black president and kind of honoring him in pop culture, but I think the use of such a derogatory word that oppressed all of those people mentioned is ignorant and cancels out any legitimacy it might have had.

Friday, 07 November 2008

  • Obama the Socialist?

    No, sir. He is not a socialist. I was reading articles online - legit and not - about Obama's relationship with socialism (and what the fuck socialism is). Though he has socialist policies and ideas, there are no truly condemning traces of socialist views in his plans and goals for the United States. Do you really think he could get away with them if he tried? And apparently, he is not the only politician who thinks using socialist tools is an idea of how to fix or better our nation's economy. Socialism doesn't work out in any culture, apparently. And honestly, even if he does try to institute any mildly socialist policies into the United States, what does it matter? Presidents fuck up. They don't know what they're doing - no one does. There really isn't any surefire way to know what's going on and specifically how to fix it. If he does something and fucks up, don't you think John McCain would have come up with something else that turned out to be wildly unpopular and not so good for the country? I voted for Barack Obama because he is the change we need. Life is based on changes, trial and error. John McCain did not have any ideas about instituting change. We tried George Bush's way for the past eight years and the last four didn't work out so well. Obama, while having some socialist ideas about him, is NOT a socialist. He's actually far from it. If he ever turns around and reveals a complete socialist attitude and attempt at turning the US into a socialist country, no one would let that stand. So don't be scared. No one's perfect.

Wednesday, 05 November 2008

  • I voted!

    I voted for Barack Obama. I helped make history. I hope JJJ replaces him in the senate. That'd be sweet.

    PS. I think its so cute how Jesse Jackson was crying because it was so genuine. My brother said, and I agree, that he probably didn't think he would see this happen. Even though I'm not black, I am so proud to be alive and active in this generation where we elected - by a huge margin - a black president. 91% of black voters went Obama. The youth defied statistics and actually voted!!! I can't say how proud I am of that. Actually, both of those things because the black vote went up, too. This election had to bring record numbers to the polls and its just so amazing how Barack Obama did that.

Top Tags

[no tags]

moeria410

  • Visit moeria410's Xanga Site
    • Name: moe
    • Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Birthday: 4/7/1989
    • Member Since: 3/29/2005

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

  • im really interesting, i think. im just not skilled at telling you about myself without being overly negative. i am really sweet but im also a pushover. i have a lot of repressed anger because i dont fight or yell. im really, really, really, REALLY shy. i love musical theatre, i think. i just need to find my niche cause honestly im pretty lost right now but i love my friends. they keep me going.

Pulse

Photostrip

[no photos]

Recommended

[no recommendations]